[Verse 1] When a client needs assurance but not a full audit trail Two pathways emerge when traditional methods fail Review engagement offers limited confidence today While compilation simply puts the data on display [Chorus] Review gives some assurance, compilation gives none R-E-V-I-E-W means limited confidence won C-O-M-P-I-L-E just arranges what they've done Know your engagement letter before the work's begun Limited versus zero, that's the key distinction Choose your service wisely for the right prescription [Verse 2] In review work we question, analyze and inquire Test for reasonableness, dig deeper and require Plausibility procedures, analytical review Independence is essential in everything we do [Chorus] Review gives some assurance, compilation gives none R-E-V-I-E-W means limited confidence won C-O-M-P-I-L-E just arranges what they've done Know your engagement letter before the work's begun Limited versus zero, that's the key distinction Choose your service wisely for the right prescription [Verse 3] Compilation takes the data as management provides No testing or procedures, just organizing guides Present information clearly in financial form Independence isn't required, different standards norm [Bridge] When stakeholders need comfort but audit's too much cost Review fills the middle ground, assurance isn't lost But when presentation matters and assurance isn't key Compilation serves the purpose for transparency [Chorus] Review gives some assurance, compilation gives none R-E-V-I-E-W means limited confidence won C-O-M-P-I-L-E just arranges what they've done Know your engagement letter before the work's begun Limited versus zero, that's the key distinction Choose your service wisely for the right prescription [Outro] Two services, two purposes, two levels of care Match the client's needs with standards we declare
← Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements | Attestation for Non-Financial Information →