[Verse 1] STIGs tell you how to lock one system down Check the boxes, follow rules that they have found But what happens when you need the bigger view? When compliance spans across frameworks too? OSCAL rises where the STIGs fall short System-wide and multi-standard support [Chorus] Four things OSCAL does that STIGs don't know System-level, multi-framework flow Lifecycle management, shared responsibility Machine-readable for true security Assessment automation, evidence in place Continuous monitoring keeps up the pace [Verse 2] Authorization lifecycle from start to end Control selection through assessment and defend Shared responsibility modeled in the code Provider, customer, inherited load No more guessing who controls what part OSCAL makes it clear right from the start [Chorus] Four things OSCAL does that STIGs don't know System-level, multi-framework flow Lifecycle management, shared responsibility Machine-readable for true security Assessment automation, evidence in place Continuous monitoring keeps up the pace [Bridge] Gone are three hundred page documents Word files that nobody implements Structured data drives the tools we need Assessment workflows automated indeed Evidence attached in back-matter clean Best compliance model we've ever seen [Verse 3] FedRAMP, CMMC, SOC 2 at once Single dataset handles every hunt Point-in-time snapshots are yesterday's game Continuous findings keep security's flame Observation models capture what you find Ongoing monitoring peace of mind [Chorus] Four things OSCAL does that STIGs don't know System-level, multi-framework flow Lifecycle management, shared responsibility Machine-readable for true security Assessment automation, evidence in place Continuous monitoring keeps up the pace [Outro] When you need more than configuration rules OSCAL gives you comprehensive tools System-wide compliance made to last OSCAL's the future, STIGs are the past
← 3 Native Traceability | 5 What OSCAL Doesn't Do That STIGs Do →