[Verse 1]
DoD system owners face a double bind
Technical hardening and docs combined
STIG controls lock down every machine
OSCAL packages keep the records clean
Product level compliance is just the start
Authorization papers play their part
[Chorus]
Who needs both, who needs both
STIG and OSCAL oath by oath
Technical depth and governance height
Both together make it right
Who needs both, can't choose one side
Hardening specs and docs collide
[Verse 2]
FedRAMP providers know this game so well
Infrastructure STIGs they know by smell
But PMO wants packages formatted clean
OSCAL structures for the compliance scene
Cloud service providers bridge the gap
Between the hardening and the paperwork map
[Chorus]
Who needs both, who needs both
STIG and OSCAL oath by oath
Technical depth and governance height
Both together make it right
Who needs both, can't choose one side
Hardening specs and docs collide
[Verse 3]
CMMC contractors seeking their certification
STIG hardening for CUI information
Assessment documentation needs OSCAL form
Two different languages, both are the norm
Defense contractors learn this bitter truth
Both frameworks needed as compliance proof
[Bridge]
GRC platforms bridge the divide
SCAP results flowing inside
Transforming technical data streams
Into OSCAL governance dreams
Consultants working federal ground
Master both or you'll be found
[Chorus]
Who needs both, who needs both
STIG and OSCAL oath by oath
Technical depth and governance height
Both together make it right
Who needs both, can't choose one side
Hardening specs and docs collide
[Outro]
Technical layer, governance layer
Both required for the prayer
STIG and OSCAL hand in hand
Compliance across the land